JoonasTo wrote:
Just a note, if you reference other people's videos, link them in the description at least, annotation over the video is better if you want them to check it out. If not just leave it in the description.
I probably don't have to tell you since it was a test but don't hate on things/swear/create bias in tutorials. Not the first impression you want to give of the community.
Regarding faction choice video, you say don't pick Aeon and that they are hard. I wouldn't agree with that approach. Let's say someone is coming from a micro intensive RTS background, AoE:RoR, SC:BW, SC2. They're used to dealing with unit micro as they play, now there's a lot of new stuff to learn ofc but a lot of the macro existent in those series is automated in this. It leaves a lot of time to micro units around. So better approach would probably be to emphasis that Aeon should only be picked if you have apm to spare for constant micro of units.
Plus UEF is weak against cybran untill t3 in most ladder maps so I'm not sure if it's the best choice for beginners there. Custom games it's good indeed.
You know, i have to thank you for this because i will fully admit i was locked in the mindset of "new to the game, new to RTS"
Whilst i still believe people should start with UEF (sub 1300 regardless of rating the factional strengths aren't played to as much as their obvious weaknesses) i will make a mental note to give leeway to people who have an rts background.
*gives the third Soviet approval award everStatistics: Posted by Sovietpride — 26 Jan 2016, 20:07
]]>