Morax wrote:

VioletAnia wrote:softley messaged me earlier today saying that he wants to have "inaccurate" taken out of the rules, his reasoning was that then saying "the sky is green" would be breaking the aeolus rules. etc.
just noting it here as i asked him to post or pm the suggest because faf forums is the easiest way for me to go back and check on what everyone thinks about the rules but i suppose he forgot and i didn't want to forget someones opinion.
anyways guys, you guys have like a day or two so speak now or forever hold your peace jokes! <3

Are you saying that the new rules will be in place in a couple of days or that the next draft will be written?

VioletAnia wrote:
softley messaged me earlier today saying that he wants to have "inaccurate" taken out of the rules, his reasoning was that then saying "the sky is green" would be breaking the aeolus rules. etc.
just noting it here as i asked him to post or pm the suggest because faf forums is the easiest way for me to go back and check on what everyone thinks about the rules but i suppose he forgot and i didn't want to forget someones opinion.
anyways guys, you guys have like a day or two so speak now or forever hold your peace jokes! <3

VioletAnia wrote:
his reasoning was that then saying "the sky is green" would be breaking the aeolus rules. etc.

briang wrote:
I want a policy on ctrlk-all in team games. I don't care what it is I just want an explicit, written policy.

Morax wrote:
I think this discussion should be closed and work should be done to refine the rules for "Take 2" as things have really spiraled out of control. I have some good ideas on how to communicate things in a better manner.

JoonasTo wrote:
Rules can be be too harsh or too lenient, that's not really an issue. You read the rules, you abide by them or risk the consequences. But what if you can't because the rules are ambiguous?

other in violation of any law

Which country's laws? You can't expect people to be familiar with a third country's legislation.

You will not send messages of illegal nature or messages that detail ways to perform acts of an illegal nature.

Again illegal in what country? Alcohol has been discussed in Aeolus...

You will not create offensive usernames as determined by the community staff.

We are mind-readers? At least this seems to be mostly handled by name change requests so that's not too bad. Just creates extra work for moderators.


And what happens in Aeolus should stay in Aeolus, I'm not sure there is an offense severe enough to be committed in it to warrant ban from FAF.

Zoram wrote:

bugblatterbeast wrote:all you said

fair enough

By more insulting, I meant that all the snark, rethoric and mis-representation of opposing views and all, didn't look to me as an attempt at debating ... but rather, in a way, to "offend" (no need to use racial slur to belittle people), which I found ironic.
(of course, nowhere close to "blatant racism", but I havn't seen that here)

But we can all get carried away in a battle of wits at times.

I don't think there'll ever be a good reason to call a game "no niggers", and that the reason as to why should be taken to off-topic at this point.

bugblatterbeast wrote:
all you said