Statistics: Posted by JJ173 — 14 Nov 2017, 16:36
Statistics: Posted by Ze Dogfather — 14 Nov 2017, 02:55
Statistics: Posted by Voodoo — 13 Nov 2017, 21:15
Statistics: Posted by jackherer — 13 Nov 2017, 15:05
Statistics: Posted by moonbearonmeth — 13 Nov 2017, 09:10
Statistics: Posted by Ze Dogfather — 13 Nov 2017, 07:47
Statistics: Posted by speed2 — 13 Nov 2017, 00:46
speed2 wrote:......
Statistics: Posted by speed2 — 12 Nov 2017, 22:32
There were some that were certainly in a gray area, such as the client ban that utilized aeolus rules on a rule-breaking activity taking place in a non-aeolus channel.
Statistics: Posted by TheKoopa — 12 Nov 2017, 22:10
Again not properly adjusted to my statement. I would like to see some anoynmous stats, without any name or replay, about how many irc and client bans took place in the past month. That is called transparency and not public shaming.
Then the community might understand, that mods are too overworked to put a proper banning system in place, like i suggested one.
But breaking rules in aeolus is something completly different and should be punished with aeolus restrictions.
speed2 wrote:
That thread only existed because it was theh only way of telling people why they were banned. As I said above ^^ with the new system we can include the ban reason and as you could have seen in preview posts, the banned user will see the reason.Mephi wrote:Yes i know, but that only supports my point of view in that part. Because it was the only source of "transparency".
Yet again, i only get the "wont work, too much work" excuse. Of how many bans are we speaken here? 10 a month?
Just set a deadline, the respective player gets a message as soon the report appears, then he has for example 2 days to respond. An addition could come with the new moderator tools, the respective player gets a popup everytime he logs in during that time and hasnt decided yet what to do.
Sure nobody expects a perfect system, but we should try to make it better than it is now, because there are continous complains about moderation, i can recall at least 3 threads of this kind.
Neither you speed nor voodoo replied to the team of 3 system, although it could solve some issues. Sure it would cut down sovereignity of the mod team and would feel strange in the beginning, yet it has potential.
Statistics: Posted by speed2 — 12 Nov 2017, 22:04
Statistics: Posted by Viba — 12 Nov 2017, 20:11
Statistics: Posted by Morax — 12 Nov 2017, 17:44
Statistics: Posted by Voodoo — 12 Nov 2017, 16:30