Forged Alliance Forever Forged Alliance Forever Forums 2013-06-29T01:04:55+02:00 /feed.php?f=2&t=4358 2013-06-29T01:04:55+02:00 2013-06-29T01:04:55+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4358&p=47186#p47186 <![CDATA[Re: Supreme Commander Getting some Exposure]]>
laPPen wrote:
My guess is it means something like he doest want to have advertisement in faf.

same for 99% of us imo.
exposure is all good. adverts in FAF lobby would put people right off.

Statistics: Posted by FireMessiah — 29 Jun 2013, 01:04


]]>
2013-06-29T00:26:22+02:00 2013-06-29T00:26:22+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4358&p=47184#p47184 <![CDATA[Re: Supreme Commander Getting some Exposure]]> My guess is it means something like he doest want to have advertisement in faf.

Statistics: Posted by laPPen — 29 Jun 2013, 00:26


]]>
2013-06-28T23:39:55+02:00 2013-06-28T23:39:55+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4358&p=47182#p47182 <![CDATA[Re: Supreme Commander Getting some Exposure]]>
Ze_PilOt wrote:
The first thing I install on a new PC is an decent ad-blocker (youtube video ads included), it's for imposing some to my project.


Huh?

Statistics: Posted by Nombringer — 28 Jun 2013, 23:39


]]>
2013-06-28T20:34:43+02:00 2013-06-28T20:34:43+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4358&p=47179#p47179 <![CDATA[Re: Supreme Commander Getting some Exposure]]> Statistics: Posted by Ze_PilOt — 28 Jun 2013, 20:34


]]>
2013-06-28T20:14:11+02:00 2013-06-28T20:14:11+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4358&p=47176#p47176 <![CDATA[Re: Supreme Commander Getting some Exposure]]> Maybe that could afford to pay pr measures like mentioned in my last post.
For my part i wouldnt mind having advertisement somewhere in the faf window if that would help the faf project.
I am curios to hear your guys opinions on that.

Statistics: Posted by laPPen — 28 Jun 2013, 20:14


]]>
2013-06-28T20:00:59+02:00 2013-06-28T20:00:59+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4358&p=47175#p47175 <![CDATA[Re: Supreme Commander Getting some Exposure]]> Just an idea. ^^

Statistics: Posted by laPPen — 28 Jun 2013, 20:00


]]>
2013-06-28T18:56:21+02:00 2013-06-28T18:56:21+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4358&p=47174#p47174 <![CDATA[Re: Supreme Commander Getting some Exposure]]> Statistics: Posted by Lu_Xun_17 — 28 Jun 2013, 18:56


]]>
2013-06-28T18:28:27+02:00 2013-06-28T18:28:27+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4358&p=47173#p47173 <![CDATA[Re: Supreme Commander Getting some Exposure]]> Statistics: Posted by Swkoll — 28 Jun 2013, 18:28


]]>
2013-06-28T15:29:45+02:00 2013-06-28T15:29:45+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4358&p=47168#p47168 <![CDATA[Re: Supreme Commander Getting some Exposure]]>
Gowerly wrote:
I met TB while going to an SC2 tournament in feb last year. I mentioned it there, but he didn't really seem all that interested. I think he does what he wants to do rather than what people ask him to do most of the time. Might be worth another try, though.


That's interesting. He said Supreme Commander was one of his favorite RTS as well as TA. Maybe with PA coming out his interesting has been piqued a little? I kind of agree with Zep though. We should probably wait until GW is finished or the next balance patch is out. All the same it's nice to see someone of at least some renown saying some good things about SupCom. If you watch that video he even says he wishes PA had adjacency and stuff like that. I figure, he has 1.1 million subs. If half of those watch his PA video and then half of those watched one of the reccomended videos about SupCom from one of the casters that's a significant amount of exposure. I may be totally wrong about these figures though.

Statistics: Posted by Astrofoo — 28 Jun 2013, 15:29


]]>
2013-06-28T15:12:50+02:00 2013-06-28T15:12:50+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4358&p=47167#p47167 <![CDATA[Re: Supreme Commander Getting some Exposure]]> Statistics: Posted by SeraphimLeftNut — 28 Jun 2013, 15:12


]]>
2013-06-28T13:01:22+02:00 2013-06-28T13:01:22+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4358&p=47163#p47163 <![CDATA[Re: Supreme Commander Getting some Exposure]]> all that interested. I think he does what he wants to do rather than what people ask him to do most of the time. Might be worth another try, though.

Statistics: Posted by Gowerly — 28 Jun 2013, 13:01


]]>
2013-06-28T08:00:28+02:00 2013-06-28T08:00:28+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4358&p=47146#p47146 <![CDATA[Re: Supreme Commander Getting some Exposure]]> Statistics: Posted by Ze_PilOt — 28 Jun 2013, 08:00


]]>
2013-06-28T07:18:44+02:00 2013-06-28T07:18:44+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4358&p=47143#p47143 <![CDATA[Re: Supreme Commander Getting some Exposure]]>
[email protected] (I think?)

Statistics: Posted by Nombringer — 28 Jun 2013, 07:18


]]>
2013-06-28T05:20:08+02:00 2013-06-28T05:20:08+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4358&p=47141#p47141 <![CDATA[Supreme Commander Getting some Exposure]]> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omg0JWIgJv4

Statistics: Posted by Astrofoo — 28 Jun 2013, 05:20


]]>