Forged Alliance Forever Forged Alliance Forever Forums 2014-06-02T11:04:33+02:00 /feed.php?f=2&t=7438 2014-06-02T11:04:33+02:00 2014-06-02T11:04:33+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7438&p=74393#p74393 <![CDATA[Re: Why is aeon t3 air support fac 33% cheaper than others?]]> Statistics: Posted by IceDreamer — 02 Jun 2014, 11:04


]]>
2014-06-01T17:07:05+02:00 2014-06-01T17:07:05+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7438&p=74357#p74357 <![CDATA[Re: Why is aeon t3 air support fac 33% cheaper than others?]]> Statistics: Posted by E8400-CV — 01 Jun 2014, 17:07


]]>
2014-06-01T13:06:36+02:00 2014-06-01T13:06:36+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7438&p=74342#p74342 <![CDATA[Re: Why is aeon t3 air support fac 33% cheaper than others?]]> Statistics: Posted by IceDreamer — 01 Jun 2014, 13:06


]]>
2014-06-01T11:02:29+02:00 2014-06-01T11:02:29+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7438&p=74340#p74340 <![CDATA[Re: Why is aeon t3 air support fac 33% cheaper than others?]]> Statistics: Posted by Styrbjorn — 01 Jun 2014, 11:02


]]>
2014-05-20T23:08:46+02:00 2014-05-20T23:08:46+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7438&p=73454#p73454 <![CDATA[Re: Why is aeon t3 air support fac 33% cheaper than others?]]>
Ze_PilOt wrote:
You lived with that for 6 months, you can survive another month.

It had been reported already before engy mod implementation :p
But yeah, I guess survival will be possible.

Statistics: Posted by SC-Account — 20 May 2014, 23:08


]]>
2014-05-20T21:38:05+02:00 2014-05-20T21:38:05+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7438&p=73437#p73437 <![CDATA[Re: Why is aeon t3 air support fac 33% cheaper than others?]]>
Cause having E-storage on T3 air is a great thing, especially for the T3 air power house fraction. (Same with the mass discount.)

And the naval powerhouse (Sera) has similar advantages with their naval factory while the T2 navy powerhouse (cybran) has a T3 disadvantage.

Not saying we should keep it, but all of these actually have reasoning behind them. I mean, if one randomly cost 5 less mass, error. This, maybe intended but why?

Statistics: Posted by errorblankfield — 20 May 2014, 21:38


]]>
2014-05-20T10:23:45+02:00 2014-05-20T10:23:45+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7438&p=73384#p73384 <![CDATA[Re: Why is aeon t3 air support fac 33% cheaper than others?]]> real reason that Setons air players go Aeon is revealed :twisted:

Statistics: Posted by Reaper Zwei — 20 May 2014, 10:23


]]>
2014-05-20T09:04:55+02:00 2014-05-20T09:04:55+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7438&p=73379#p73379 <![CDATA[Re: Why is aeon t3 air support fac 33% cheaper than others?]]>

Statistics: Posted by Lu_Xun_17 — 20 May 2014, 09:04


]]>
2014-05-20T07:57:26+02:00 2014-05-20T07:57:26+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7438&p=73374#p73374 <![CDATA[Re: Why is aeon t3 air support fac 33% cheaper than others?]]> Statistics: Posted by Ze_PilOt — 20 May 2014, 07:57


]]>
2014-05-20T05:49:05+02:00 2014-05-20T05:49:05+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7438&p=73363#p73363 <![CDATA[Re: Why is aeon t3 air support fac 33% cheaper than others?]]> Statistics: Posted by nine2 — 20 May 2014, 05:49


]]>
2014-05-20T03:45:17+02:00 2014-05-20T03:45:17+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7438&p=73360#p73360 <![CDATA[Re: Why is aeon t3 air support fac 33% cheaper than others?]]> Statistics: Posted by IceDreamer — 20 May 2014, 03:45


]]>
2014-05-20T03:12:27+02:00 2014-05-20T03:12:27+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7438&p=73359#p73359 <![CDATA[Re: Why is aeon t3 air support fac 33% cheaper than others?]]> Statistics: Posted by nine2 — 20 May 2014, 03:12


]]>
2014-05-19T07:57:38+02:00 2014-05-19T07:57:38+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7438&p=73284#p73284 <![CDATA[Re: Why is aeon t3 air support fac 33% cheaper than others?]]> Statistics: Posted by IceDreamer — 19 May 2014, 07:57


]]>
2014-05-18T21:59:06+02:00 2014-05-18T21:59:06+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7438&p=73241#p73241 <![CDATA[Re: Why is aeon t3 air support fac 33% cheaper than others?]]> Statistics: Posted by E8400-CV — 18 May 2014, 21:59


]]>
2014-05-18T20:41:49+02:00 2014-05-18T20:41:49+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7438&p=73236#p73236 <![CDATA[Re: Why is aeon t3 air support fac 33% cheaper than others?]]>
Aeon T3 Support Air Factory upgrade: 490M/18211E VS 1000M/26182E and it also has 1600 energy storage which no others do.
Cybran T3 Support Naval Factory upgrade: 1:33 Buildtime vs 1:06 for all the others.

Is there any reason for this, anyone?

Have uncovered a UI bug. The displayed upgrade costs for icons displayed on uncompleted factories are higher than the actual. As in you select a factory, upgrade it, the UI changes to make T2 visible, the cost of the T3 upgrade displayed is higher than it should be, and is reduced when the upgrade finishes.

Statistics: Posted by IceDreamer — 18 May 2014, 20:41


]]>