Statistics: Posted by Hawkei — 14 Dec 2014, 08:44
Ah btw about that sticking someone's tongue in inappropriate places, that is also not true at all.
Statistics: Posted by Anaryl — 11 Dec 2014, 15:04
Statistics: Posted by Mad`Mozart — 11 Dec 2014, 14:14
Anaryl wrote:
I like that you get offended that I can type faster than you. It took me twenty minutes to write that post, and I did other stuff like make a cup of tea and smoke a couple of cigarettes. If you can't handle the pace, get out of the fast lane.
Statistics: Posted by lextoc — 11 Dec 2014, 13:30
Statistics: Posted by RoLa — 11 Dec 2014, 12:53
Statistics: Posted by RoLa — 11 Dec 2014, 12:48
Statistics: Posted by Neutrino — 11 Dec 2014, 12:43
Maybe should instead stop for a bit and think why they dont play?
He makes a subjective statement
Then bashes TA for making one too. Haha, seriously?
I dont know about you guys, but i personally cant take Anaryl seriously here. Of all the people in this discussion he is contributing the least to it just raging around and shaking air. And having an extremely inflated ego he doesnt listen to anything or anyone. So yeah go on hate and bash me for skipping any constructive discussion and moving straight to the offensive shit but i dont feel sorry about it at all.
So here he questions the whole ladder concept here of climbing your way up to top. Also not even trying to be objective and not giving a single Scheiße about other people's opinion (e.g. do low rated guys really want to play top 10 on a constant basis?)
PS his point seems to be stop hearing opinions of people who dont play the ladder - cause they dont deserve a say. Which i find wrong and purely selfish, elitist, stupid, add your own word. Instead should focus on why they dont play and more importantly why they quit playing ladder.
Statistics: Posted by Anaryl — 11 Dec 2014, 11:58
Who's fault is that? When the higest ranking players playing ladder are rated 1600ish - how is anybody supposed to move up when you guys don't play?
1. There are many more players on FAF than there are players on the ladder.
There are a lot more people who play backyard cricket than those who play International Tests - what is your point?
It's also really boring. Some of us don't think that investing 100 hours every week for a rating gain of 200 points is a worthwhile investment. We play for fun.
You base a lot of things on yourself. You can't extrapolate your opinion to everyone else. If I only have twenty minutes before I have to walk out the door, I don't start a game of SupCom. Who does that?
Have you ever considered that maybe, just maybe only being able to be matched with ten other people on the whole damn planet (well technically, the whole damn universe) is the reason why top players can't seem to find a game? Maybe if we increase the brackets so top 50 players face a greater number of challengers below them. Zep used to say "Well, maybe top rated players don't want to play lower rated players" - but that logic was flawed. If you're at the top, you should be forced to defend your position, not be protected. How are you going to generate new pros if you never play them? Right now, the only way to break into the top 50 is to find a top 20 player, stick your tongue up their butthole and have them train you. Again, this is strong evidence that the highest rated players deliberately cultivate a monopoly.
Statistics: Posted by Mad`Mozart — 11 Dec 2014, 11:42
Statistics: Posted by Crotalus — 11 Dec 2014, 11:41
Statistics: Posted by Anaryl — 11 Dec 2014, 11:03
Statistics: Posted by prodromos — 11 Dec 2014, 10:56
Statistics: Posted by Aurion — 11 Dec 2014, 10:42