Forged Alliance Forever

Re: Should lvl 0 be allowed to put there attacks on hold

2013-08-22T22:01:33+02:00

Yes, it should be limited to 1, I agree.

Statistics: Posted by Ze_PilOt — 22 Aug 2013, 22:01

Re: Should lvl 0 be allowed to put there attacks on hold

2013-08-22T21:44:40+02:00

Rank 0 needs to have a role, but maybe if it's possible to limit the number they can have at any one time? Rather then one rank 0 being able to put on hold attacks everywhere. Don't know if it matters enough to be worthwhile...

Statistics: Posted by Stranger — 22 Aug 2013, 21:44

Re: Should lvl 0 be allowed to put there attacks on hold

2013-08-22T15:46:52+02:00

I'm not saying it's the best solution, but GW is about collaboration.
Also, all ranks should have advantages, but also downsides.

Statistics: Posted by Ze_PilOt — 22 Aug 2013, 15:46

Re: Should lvl 0 be allowed to put there attacks on hold

2013-08-22T15:32:53+02:00

that is how it is made on purpuse, cooperation.

rank 0 gives attacks, rank 10 gives t3 bots in reinforcements

Statistics: Posted by ZLO_RD — 22 Aug 2013, 15:32

Re: Should lvl 0 be allowed to put there attacks on hold

2013-08-22T15:05:20+02:00

i think thats the point

Statistics: Posted by Supremegod — 22 Aug 2013, 15:05

Should lvl 0 be allowed to put there attacks on hold

2013-08-22T14:46:49+02:00

When you start off lv 0 attacks are free, so if abused the lv 0 player can place down attacks for free and put them on hold for other players to pick up and use making in turn there attacks free, the lv 0 may do this as many times as they want leaving multiple attacks on hold. and so i believe lv 0 players should not beable to put there attacks on hold but instead drop them all together if they wish, because they arnt loosing any credits.

Statistics: Posted by AIbooster — 22 Aug 2013, 14:46