by Cerberus » 14 Sep 2012, 01:08
I love this idea to death, however, I may just be a party pooper, but is there such thing as winning with a game-ender on a ladder match when 99.9% of ladder maps are, or play as 10k maps or smaller, and your opponent has to be evenly matched? IMO, thats pretty much having a even game, and then giving them a 10 t4 unit advantage while you build a unit costing 250,200 mass. (T4 missile launcher) vs 25,000 (according to DB, it might be 35,000 IIRC) mass (T4 sera bot) times 10.
The only way I can see someone doing this is if they just pen someone in their main base for 20-40 minutes while they tech up all their mass to t3, and make a game ender. Thats just a d*** move, tbh. Plus, Im sure 95% of people would leave if they knew they were being toyed with.
Also, Having the cybran game ender cost slightly more then a t4 bomber or czar, and about 5 times less then a sera, uef, or aeon game ender is kinda imba. But it might be the first time cybrans get an advantage in something ^^
I would like to vote to change the conditions for the next ladder challenge.
Icy wrote:*Imagines cerberus doing bomber first with 10 extra buildpower*