Soulreaper veterancy nerf & HARMS hp nerf.

[Ze_PilOt]

All in the title.

[ColonelSheppard]

I never had problems with HARMs or Soulripper, i dont think they should be changed in any way

[Ze_PilOt]

It's not a voting forum. It's only for discussing the viability and numbers.

[BRNKoINSANITY]

The ripper is not that great at sniping single targets (not as good as czar or Sera t4 bomber) and is easily shot down by ASF swarm or a lot of flak... I think the easy vet comes mostly from the spread out firing pattern affecting swarms of t1 engies. As things stand the Ripper seems pretty balanced to me.

[Lu_Xun_17]

I never had problems with HARMs or Soulripper, i dont think they should be changed in any way

Did you ever reached the T4 stage Sheppard?

[ColonelSheppard]

yes, but harms are killed by a Galaxy & souldripper should be killed BEFORE it is over you base

[JeeVeS]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6CRSWp4j7U#

Even with nerfed veterancy they'll still have the same air crash damage lu. =p

[Seleucus24]

Played a lotta T4 games, soul ripper seems fine. Lasts a little longer but has lower concentrated DPS. Only issues arise when a Phantom rushes one and gets the free HP boost from killing engineers.

[Stratocaster]

If the HARMS didn't have so much HP, I wouldn't resort to [cheap] ground attack tactics with anything with AoE. It seriously outclasses every naval unit (without resorting to ground attack). If it gets a HP nerf, it should be submerged a bit deeper so it doesn't get damaged by Sera T1 arty, battleships, etc. firing at the surface of the water just above them.

[RK4000]

The Soul Ripper is just fine as is, it's rediculusly expensive and takes quite a bit of skill to even keep it in the air, despite it's huge HP pool. If you don't Ctrl-K your T1 engineers when you see it coming that's your problem