Introduce t1 torp bombers for sera

Moderator: JaggedAppliance

Introduce t1 torp bombers for sera

Postby Hush » 17 Sep 2016, 19:54

as the title says, since sera are lacking a t3 gunship they should get something else to compensate. My reasons are listed below:

1. no t3 sonar
2. I know better than you. do it.

Creative discussion, as always is allowed, but bare in mind if you disagree with me you are wrong.
' I wish I was as good as Hush' - Thekooper
Hush
Crusader
 
Posts: 38
Joined: 28 Jan 2016, 18:26
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 9 times
FAF User Name: Hush

Re: Introduce t1 torp bombers for sera

Postby Gorton » 17 Sep 2016, 19:58

It's been an idea circulating for a while to make the gunship better, like t 2.5 like the ilsha, prob small price increase/ BT and good buff to stats.


Also moved to balance forum.
"who is this guy, he didnt play gpg or what?" - RA_ZLO

*FAF Moderator*
Gorton
Councillor - Moderation
 
Posts: 2543
Joined: 16 Apr 2013, 21:57
Location: United Kingdom
Has liked: 1067 times
Been liked: 455 times
FAF User Name: Gorton

Re: Introduce t1 torp bombers for sera

Postby Exotic_Retard » 17 Sep 2016, 20:01

Gorton wrote:It's been an idea circulating for a while to make the gunship better, like t 2.5 like the ilsha, prob small price increase/ BT and good buff to stats.





http://equilibrium.x10host.com/changelog/#t2air
User avatar
Exotic_Retard
Contributor
 
Posts: 1470
Joined: 21 Mar 2013, 22:51
Has liked: 557 times
Been liked: 626 times
FAF User Name: Exotic_Retard

Re: Introduce t1 torp bombers for sera

Postby Zock » 17 Sep 2016, 20:50

will t1 sera torps be in equilibrium though?
gg no re

ohh! what a pretty shining link! https://www.youtube.com/c/Zockyzock
User avatar
Zock
Supreme Commander
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: 31 Aug 2011, 22:44
Has liked: 173 times
Been liked: 397 times
FAF User Name: Zock

Re: Introduce t1 torp bombers for sera

Postby Ithilis_Quo » 18 Sep 2016, 15:29

Zock wrote:will t1 sera torps be in equilibrium though?

In this time no, while it is new units and one of Equilibrium core principle is not add any new units to game (to keep eq be intuitive).

But it is good point to discusion and one poisble way how neglect seraphim inferiority in small units set.
"Fixed in Equilibrium" Washy
User avatar
Ithilis_Quo
Supreme Commander
 
Posts: 1390
Joined: 29 Dec 2012, 15:55
Location: Slovakia
Has liked: 395 times
Been liked: 181 times
FAF User Name: Ithilis

Re: Introduce t1 torp bombers for sera

Postby RoQe » 22 Sep 2016, 11:48

wait, are we talking about giving seraphim non traditional units? :o

I say yes, especially given the fact that t1 subs are the way they are for sera, but I do advocate for the t1 torp bombers to be only effective against t1 subs (damage wise), ya know, to negate the lack of an average t1 submarine in the sera navy. call it a subhunter if you will ;)
maybe 75-100 damage per pass, make it cost a little more for its damage output than the t2 torp bomber would, so t2 torps will still be more viable (kinda like the jester approach).
oh, and do something funny with how the torps work on this one, per say: circle around the ship first or anything along those lines, to make it even less effective against t2 (most t2 navy units have torp defense)

''problems'' with this balance: sera will be the only faction in the t1 stage that can effectively clear their bay of a t1 sub navy denial without moving their acu or a considerable amount of buildpower into the water.
RoQe
Crusader
 
Posts: 18
Joined: 31 Aug 2015, 16:14
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 1 time
FAF User Name: RoQe


Return to Balance Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest